<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Whoops! Half a million pounds slips past Boris</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/</link>
	<description>An attempt to enhance the accountability of the new London mayoralty</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:30:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: a very public sociologist</title>
		<link>http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/comment-page-1/#comment-527</link>
		<dc:creator>a very public sociologist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 18:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/#comment-527</guid>
		<description>As Cameron gets his knickers in a twist over financial probity here we have Boris lavishing taxpayers cash  in a bunch of over-privileged consultants and hangers on. The shape of things to come should the Tories get in in 2010?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Cameron gets his knickers in a twist over financial probity here we have Boris lavishing taxpayers cash  in a bunch of over-privileged consultants and hangers on. The shape of things to come should the Tories get in in 2010?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Offensive, Moi?</title>
		<link>http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/comment-page-1/#comment-525</link>
		<dc:creator>Offensive, Moi?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 16:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/#comment-525</guid>
		<description>[...] keen to reply to the disgraceful latter slur, but presently he&#8217;s a little busy attempting to locate half a million [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] keen to reply to the disgraceful latter slur, but presently he&#8217;s a little busy attempting to locate half a million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Johnson&#8217;s forgets his £465,000 bill for consultants &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</title>
		<link>http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/comment-page-1/#comment-513</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Johnson&#8217;s forgets his £465,000 bill for consultants &#124; Liberal Democrat Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 11:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/#comment-513</guid>
		<description>[...] tip: Boris Watch.   Posted in London Mayor        // Startup variables var theSelection = false; // Check for [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tip: Boris Watch.   Posted in London Mayor        // Startup variables var theSelection = false; // Check for [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fenby</title>
		<link>http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/comment-page-1/#comment-511</link>
		<dc:creator>Fenby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 10:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.boriswatch.co.uk/2008/06/08/whoops-half-a-million-pounds-slips-past-boris/#comment-511</guid>
		<description>&quot;I’m sure some of the &quot;Boris is a genius&quot; brigade would say it’s possible he was attempting to get past the question by pretending to have no knowledge of the controversy, but this would be a risky strategy&quot;

More importantly for a public figure, such deliberate evasion would amount to lying by omission. Which, on an individual level, might be genius, but&#039;s hardly good for London...

The interview wasn&#039;t very good. To be fair, Marr didn&#039;t seem on fomr this morning; he was surprisingly light with Jacqui Smith too. Tennant almost had the worst of it...:p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I’m sure some of the &#8220;Boris is a genius&#8221; brigade would say it’s possible he was attempting to get past the question by pretending to have no knowledge of the controversy, but this would be a risky strategy&#8221;</p>
<p>More importantly for a public figure, such deliberate evasion would amount to lying by omission. Which, on an individual level, might be genius, but&#8217;s hardly good for London&#8230;</p>
<p>The interview wasn&#8217;t very good. To be fair, Marr didn&#8217;t seem on fomr this morning; he was surprisingly light with Jacqui Smith too. Tennant almost had the worst of it&#8230;:p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
