Congestion Charge Under Threat?
I identified Victoria Borwick’s question to Boris about extended CC free times yesterday, and apparently it elicited a response that indicates that Boris is considering scrapping the entire congestion charge, which would obviously be head and shoulders above any other stupidity he’s ever mooted, as well as going against everything he said in the campaign and any pretence about democracy (it wasn’t exactly in his manifesto, was it?).
There are lots of London Tories who want to scrap it, of course, but Boris actually has to run London’s transport, not listen to a lot of shrill maniacs who are stuck in the 80s. He also has to find room for his Routemasters and sea of 12m rigid buses, plus improve air quality and encourage cycling, walking and improve the built environment, none of which is remotely compatible with encouraging more inner city car use. I hope this was just a bone tossed out to the tiresome Borwick, but after the farce of the WEZ non-consultation I’m sure Kulveer and the boys are coming up with some equally stupid scheme to prove that this is what London really wants. It would also explain the obsession with trimming huge amounts off TfL’s budget – Boris will need a considerable amount of money for this on top of the other considerable amounts of money. Hasn’t he got anyone advising him with a clue about the history of transport in London, or are they all Ken-obsessed petrolheads who think anyone on a bus is a failure and motorists need to be mollycoddled? Boy, are they in the wrong city. He’ll be bringing back the Ringways next, probably making the poor pay for it somehow.
On a musing note, I once wondered if the Routemaster open platform idea was to compensate for refusing to take any proper steps to combat traffic congestion. Hey, you can just leap off when you get stuck! Brilliant! I also note (because I wrote some of them) that Boris is getting the raspberry even from the Standard’s commenters…
4 Responses to Congestion Charge Under Threat?
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Contact us
Send us an e-mail at staff [at] boriswatch.co.ukRecent Comments
- Geoff on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Dave H on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- california on Boris Airport: Found The Proposals
- Andrew W1 on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Reverend Trevor on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Calamity Jane on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Stratford on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Max on Paparazzi Snaps Reveal Production New Bus For London Still Overweight
Events Calendar
Tags
agendas BBC BBC London bendy Boris Airport borisport broken promises budget bus buses crime culture cycling earnings environment Gilligan grasp of detail humour incompetence jobs Johnson Administration Ken Livingstone lies Mayor's Question Time olympics police Policy Exchange Press questions Rape Ray Lewis resignation RMT Routemaster salaries Speeches spin strike Stuff On Nonsense team TfL transparency transport tube TVAbout The Mayoralty
Best of teh interwebs
Local London Blogs
Other blogs written by us
Walking






You know I really wouldn’t be surprised if he did axe it…in fact I’ll go on record to say that he will.
Um… Tom,
Anybody else getting this?
Works fine for me.
Does remember the If… cartoons Steve Bell did on Boris? Boggler Boggler Heil indeed.
Let’s see which groups this will upset, ranked in order of how great their fury might be if fully outraged:
- Cyclists
- Environmentalist types
- The great unwashed
- Conservationists
- Londoners
- God
- Ken Livingstone
I remind you of the old phrase; “Hell hath no fury like Ken Livingstone.”
I also liked this little gem from the Histories page on the Ringways plan from Private Eye:
“The Minister of State has been following these papers and has commented: ‘The Inner Motorway Box will never be implemented. We are no longer living in an environment when any Government can displace thousands of people from their homes. I am sorry that RE and Cabinet should have endorsed another project which is socially and financially out of the question.”