Hélène Mulholland at guardian.co.uk reports that the obvious contradiction between Boris’s policies encouraging more pollution by axing the third phase of the Low Emission Zone (not to mention the removal of the Congestion Charge Western Extension Zone) and the legal obligation for the UK to cut pollution in London or face huge fines from the EU may be about to come to a head as the government threatens to overrule Boris’s decision(s) if he doesn’t implement something else pretty sharpish to achieve at least the same reduction in pollution (as seems very unlikely given his motorist-friendly policies thus far).
While there’s no doubt that Boris’s policies are environmentally damaging, there are two problems with this way of tackling them.
First, such a situation would be pretty bizarre, as it would be the government which is supporting Heathrow expansion in the face of (opportunistic) opposition from Boris which was suddenly acting as the defender of London air quality, in what on the face of it could look like a role reversal. (The fact that Boris’s only contribution to air quality improvement campaigning happens to be the one that involves campaigning in Tory areas against plane noise, while he’s happy to expand aviation in City Airport and his ridiculous Thames Estuary fantasy island, is sheer coincidence, of course). It’s pretty hard for one environmental hypocrite to set out to expose another; charges of what I can only think to describe as meta-hypocrisy would fly from all sides.
Second, this exposes how weak the devolved powers of London really are, as Martin from Mayorwatch® discussed in some detail on Friday in relation to other matters. If the government really can just step in and override the Mayor’s policies like this, it doesn’t inspire any great feeling of enfranchisement among London voters, however noble the government’s reasons for stepping in.
All that said, as a pragmatic environmentalist I’ll be pleased to see anything being done to cut London’s pollution and emissions – including cancelling all aviation expansion and increasing the LEZ’s vehicle coverage. It’s just a shame that someone elected promising a ‘cleaner, greener’ capital city isn’t making the right decisions for our air quality himself in the first place.
Contact usSend us an e-mail at staff [at] boriswatch.co.uk
- Geoff on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Dave H on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- california on Boris Airport: Found The Proposals
- Andrew W1 on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Reverend Trevor on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Calamity Jane on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Stratford on NB4L Means Capacity Cuts On The 24
- Max on Paparazzi Snaps Reveal Production New Bus For London Still Overweight
Tagsagendas BBC BBC London bendy Boris Airport borisport broken promises budget bus buses crime culture cycling earnings environment Gilligan grasp of detail humour incompetence jobs Johnson Administration Ken Livingstone lies Mayor's Question Time olympics police Policy Exchange Press questions Rape Ray Lewis resignation RMT Routemaster salaries Speeches spin strike Stuff On Nonsense team TfL transparency transport tube TV