Saturday 9 May sees Boris Johnson’s second annual State Of London Debate, intended to allow the London electorate to directly question the Mayor, the London Assembly and representatives of the other bodies under the Mayor’s control such as the MPA and the LDA.  Relegated last year to an evening event it has reverted to an all-day event on a Saturday, but in a massively truncated form. The State Of London Debate now  features only five “policy sessions” in the morning which repeat in the afternoon, enabling members of the public to attend, at most, two sessions.

The last State Of London Debate under the previous GLA administration, in 2007,  featured 16 different discussion sessions over three different time slots, enabling Londoners to attend more sessions on a far greater range of subjects and with many more expert speakers. If you wanted to question a member of the MPA, for instance, in 2007 you could have been face-to-face with  Steve House, Assistant Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police and Cindy Butts, Independent Member of the Metropolitan Police Authority. This year, however, Kit Malthouse, Deputy Mayor for Policing is joined by two fellow Assembly Members who are members of the MPA rather than any serving police officers.

As for Transport, in 2007  you could have directly questioned Peter Hendy, Commissioner of  Transport For London (I attended this session and it was very popular, with many questions asked and all receiving satisfactory answers) but this year you’ll be faced with the associate editor of Transport Times, the Lib Dem and Tory members of the London Assembly Transport Committee, the Tory chair of the London Councils’ Transport & Environment Committe and Kulveer Ranger, the Mayor’s Director of Transport Policy. I’m guessing Kulveer won’t be supplying many answers at this session as the usual public questions are about specific bus routes and transport interchanges, about which he quite possibly doesn’t possess the encyclopaedic knowledge of Peter Hendy. Nor does he possess the power to immediately influence day-to-day operations. Accountability, eh?

The previous State Of London Debates and their post-debate reports have now been removed from the GLA website, in Boris’s usual manner of censorship and re-writing history, but thanks to the Internet Wayback Machine I present the 2007 programme for comparison with that of the  new (un)accountable GLA:

12 May 2007 programme

10.00 to 11.25 Opening Plenary: The State of London Debate
Ken Livingstone, Mayor of London
Chair: Councillor Brian Coleman, London Assembly Member for Barnet and Camden
11.35 to 12.50 2012 Olympic Games – A lasting legacy for London
Paul Deighton, Chief Executive, London Organising Committee of the Olympic and Paralympic Games
David Higgins, Chief Executive, Olympic Delivery Authority
Manny Lewis, Chief Executive, London Development Agency
Denise Lewis, Olympic Gold Medallist
Chair: Victoria Derbyshire, Broadcaster
Multiculturalism: a key to London’s success
Diane Abbott MP, Hackney North & Stoke Newington
Gautam Banerji, Executive Member, Legal and Social Protection, Hindu Council UK
Pauline Berry, Interim Programme Director, Diversity Works for London
Inayat Bunglawala, Assistant Secretary General, Muslim Council of Britain
Dr Indarjit Singh, Director, Network of Sikh Organisations
Wilf Sullivan, Race Equality Officer, Trades Union Congress
Chair: Redmond O’Neill, Director, Public Affairs and Transport, Mayor’s Office
London’s success: ensuring everyone benefits
Karen Buck MP, Regent’s Park and Kensington North
Dinah Cox, Chief Executive, Race on the Agenda
Kate Green, Chief Executive, Child Poverty Action Group
Steve Hart, London Regional Secretary, Transport and General Workers’ Union
Neil Jameson, Lead Organiser, London Citizens
Jane Wills, Professor, Queen Mary’s University of London
Chair: Neale Coleman, Director, Business Planning and Regeneration, Mayor’s Office
London: the most successful world city?
Martine Ainsworth-Wells, Marketing Manager, Visit London
Ricky Burdett, Centennial Professor in Architecture and Urbanism, London School of Economics and Political Science
John Ross, Director, Economic and Business Policy, Mayor’s Office
Chair: Judith Woodward, Senior Policy Adviser, Cultural Strategy, Mayor’s Office
London’s transport journey
Peter Hendy, Commissioner, Transport for London
Chair: Samira Ahmed, Broadcaster and Journalist

Please contact Transport for London to put your question to Peter Hendy in advance of the debate.

13.50 to 15.05

Thames Water

Tackling climate change – what cities can achieve
Pooran Desai, Director, One Planet Living and Co-Founder, BioRegional
Paul de Zylva, Friends of the Earth England
Farhana Yamin, Fellow in Environment, Institute for Development Studies
Mark Watts, Principal Adviser on Climate Change, Mayor’s Office
Chair: Samira Ahmed, Broadcaster and Journalist
Democracy for all Londoners
Anas Altikriti, British Muslim Initiative
Jon Cruddas, MP
Bishop John Francis, Ruach Christian Ministeries
Gloria Gomez, Leader, The Latin Front
Councillor Deniz Oguzkanli
Dilip Joshi, Executive Officer, Equality & Diversity, Hindu Council UK
Dr Alistair Soyode, Chief Executive, Ben TV
Dr Mary Tilki, Chair, Federation of Irish Societies
Chair: Lucy Anderson, Business Manager, Public Affairs and Transport, Mayor’s Office
Skilled for success – jobs and training in the capital
John Attree, Director of Skills, Education and Diversity, London First
Dinah Caine, Chief Executive, Skillset
Barry Francis, Unionlearn Regional Manager, Trades Union Congress
Bill Rammell MP, Minister of State for Lifelong Learning, Further & Higher Education
Dame Ruth Silver, Board Member, London Skills and Employment Board
Chair: Khamani Eze, Business Manager, Major Projects, Mayor’s Office
London Assembly London Assembly: 2012 Olympics and Paralympic Games – the legacy for Londoners
Jennette Arnold AM, Labour, North East
Bob Blackman AM, Conservative, Brent & Harrow
Dee Doocey AM, Liberal Democrats, Londonwide
Damien Hockney AM, One London, Londonwide
Jenny Jones AM, Green, Londonwide
Chair: Mark Demery, Head of Assembly External Relations
The importance of London’s waterways
Mark Bensted, London Director, British Waterways
Richard Everitt, Chief Executive, Port of London Authority
Robert Runcie, Director, Environment Agency
Chair: Murad Qureshi AM; Chair, London Waterways Commission
Women in London today
Denise Burke, Head of Childcare, London Development Agency
Dawn Butler MP, Brent South
Davina James-Hanman, Director, Greater London Domestic Violence Project
Gita Patel, Director, Stargate Capital
Chair: Anni Marjoram, Policy Adviser, Women’s Issues, Mayor’s Office
15.30 to 16.45

LBC News

A safer London for all
Azad Ali, Chair, Muslim Safety Forum
Decima Francis, President, From Boyhood to Manhood Foundation
Steve House, Assistant Commissioner, Metropolitan Police
Cindy Butts, Independent Member of the Metropolitan Police Authority
Tony McNulty MP, Minister for Police and Security
Rev Nims Obunge, Chief Executive, Peace Alliance
Chair: Samira Ahmed, Broadcaster and Journalist
Tackling inequality – vital to London’s success
Tufyal Choudhury, Director, Discrimination Law Association
Angela Eagle MP, Wallasey
Caroline Ellis, Head of Parliamentary Affairs, Disability Rights Commission
Jonathan Finney, Parliamentary Officer, Stonewall
Maleiha Malik, Lecturer, King’s College London
Sarah Veale, Head, Equalities and Employment Rights Department, Trades Union Congress
Chair: Anne Kane, Equality Adviser to the Mayor’s Office
India and London – partners in globalisation
Shri Asoke Mukerji, Deputy High Commissioner of India
Nasreen Munni Kabir, Documentary Film-maker and Author
Chair: John Ross, Director, Economic and Business Policy, Mayor’s Office
Loving London’s global culture
Amma Asante, Writer/Director
Sandra Hebron, Director, London Film Festival
Bradley Hemmings, Artistic Director, Greenwich & Dock Festival
Helen Marriage, Director, Artichoke Productions
Chair: Anneliese Midgely, Business Manager, Culture, Mayor’s Office
London Development Agency The London Thames Gateway
Peter Andrews, Chief Executive, London Thames Gateway
John Biggs AM; Vice Chair, London Development Agency
Jenny Jones AM, Green, Londonwide
Chair: Manny Lewis, Chief Executive, London Development Agency

7 Responses to The State Of London Debate 2009

  1. Appealing of Ealing says:

    The proposed agenda is the same as 2007 — but with all the lefty PC crap taken out.

    So thank you for posting this. I have plenty of misgivings about Johnson’s leadership, but reading this reminds me why I was dead right to vote for him.

  2. OHOC says:

    In regards to AoE;

    Boris has five key areas which can be summarised thus:
    Policing, Transport, Business, Environment and Multiculturalism.

    The last two would probably fit under your definition of “lefty PC crap,” but we can give Boris some leeway. Well, you can.

    So everything else which has been left out was clearly the horrible and dreadful work of the leftist, politically correct elite.


    1) The 2012 legacy
    2) Inequality
    3) London Democracy
    4) Education and skills
    5) London’s Waterways
    6) Women
    7) India/London partnership
    8) Culture
    9) The Thames Gateway Project

    How many of those are “lefty PC crap?” Time for an ideology litmus test.

    Unless something has passed me by, a desire to ensure that the Olympics have a positive impact on London is not especially “lefty.” Seems a non-ideological issue to me; ensuring that £9.3bn isn’t spent on a glorious white mausoleum in the Lea Valley is something all parties are interested in.

    Then there’s inequality; I will be so generous as to say that’s something which the left is far more concerned about than the right.

    And then there’s the quite clearly Leftist PC discussion on London’s democracy. Democracy? In my London? Well, we can’t have that. We can’t have people discussing the health of London’s democracy. Otherwise we might end up with a system which actually works.

    Then there’s education; another non-ideological subject. Despite what you may believe, people of all parties are interested in making sure people have the necessary set of skills to find employment.

    I don’t know why London’s waterways is there. It is neither lefty, PC or wholly relevant.

    But then there’s women! Another return to form. Or is it possible that we should be discussing issues which mainly involve women? I may be wrong, but when a rapist like John Worboys is able to operate for six years with a possible victim count of 100, it might be of benefit to the capital to discuss the issue of, I’m having a wild stab in the dark here, the lack of funding for Rape Crisis centres or cutting back on an election manifesto pledge. Just possibly.

    And the Indian/London partnership. Globalisation is such a lefty issue, isn’t it? Of course, the lefty PC thing to do would be oppose such a measure, rather than actively encourage links between the financial services capital of the world and a newly industrialising country. Encouraging business links which are beneficial to both parties? Sounds like the antithesis of Socialist Action to me.

    I would give you culture, but then I remember that some of London’s biggest attractions are all cultural; the Museums, the Galleries, the Theatres. And then I remember two Simon Jenkins articles in which he pushes cultural diplomacy as being more important than the Foreign Secretary;

    Ah, Simon Jenkins. That well know… er… editor of the leftist rag The Times? Sir Simon Jenkins, a lefty PC… er… Thatcherite?

    And we conclude with the Thames Gateway; another Olympian project which is bloody important we get right. Given the large budget, the big impact and the importance this holds to London and the south-east as a whole, I would feel reassured if Boris told us what he thinks about it, what he’s doing to keep it on track and how he’d improve it (other than removing transport links in the form of bridges). Is that wrong? Is that leftist and PC? Hardly.

    So with you it seems less like a case of celebrating the end of an era of leftist PC crap and more like you’re ranting like a partisan demagogue who cares less about practicalities and more about ideology.

  3. Leo says:

    Before The State of London Debate 2009 we should be looking at The State of The GLA and it’s leadership under the Mayor for London Boris Johnson for the following reasons : To bring about Clear Truthful and Honest decisions and actions with real Transparency and Accountability. I believe that The Mayor for London’s Office should be scutinized on a daily basis by an outside independant body for the following reasons : When Boris Johnson was campaigning for votes to become Mayor for London he claimed that Ken Livingston’s office was corrupt and employee’s were syphoning of Tax Payers money that was meant for projects around London. This was later disproved and there was no wrong doing by Ken Livingstone’s staff , this only came to light after Boris Johnson became Mayor for London. How much damage was done by Boris Johnson and his advises due to those damaging claims ? So much for Transparency and Accountability on Boris Johnson’s part, as it is clear that these were Dirty Tricks. Then Boris Johnson highly recommended and employed Ray Lewis as Youth Worker but people quickly learnt that Ray Lewis was a con man that had stolen of a Church Congregation and later had to leave.. Then Boris was involved with Sir Ian Blair’s resignation under a stormy cloud and it appears that Boris Johnson broke rules here. Then we learn that Victoria Borwick had a serious conflict of interest and used Tax Payers money wrongly and claimed “Mistake Sorry” She sits on the Metropolitan Police Authority also..Then there was the Damien Green affair where Boris Johnson had clearly broken rules that he should have been very familiar with. but choose to have a lapse of memory when questioned at a Common’s Sellect Committee , amazing given how intelligent he is. Then Boris went on to voluntarily telephone Kieth Vaz and subjected him to a volley of abusive swear words, he did not have to do that ,but chose to.Also when Boris had to attend a Common’s Sellect Committee concerning the snowfall to discus what everyone can do next time to try and avoid a total shut down of London Boris got the hump and tried to walk out showing complete disrespect for the whole process. The State of London is completely at the mercy of those that are Governing it and in the manner that they do so. All I see is a Mayor that demonstrates to the London’s Youth that it is cool to be arrogant and swear when you so chose. Is this an example that those in power should be setting to the youth of London. Sadly I feel that we have a Mayor that appears slightly out of touch of reality and London is beginning to look like Gotham City with a Joker at the helm. A bad Mayoralty is bad for all Londoner’s and with what has been going on ,it requires more regulation on certain individuals to ensure Fairnes, Justice, Transparency and most importantly Accountability that is carried out. After this we should then look at The State of London in greater depth.

  4. Leo says:

    The Mayor for London Boris Johnson in fact had employed Ray Lewis as Deputy Mayor for London. For the exact details of how corrupt Ray Lewis was, can be found on :

    Please take a look and come to your own conclusions.

  5. […] address on Thursday and I have tickets and, indeed, an invitation to see Boris afterwards, like last year (where he wouldn’t look me in the eye and give me a straight answer, but that’s by the […]

  6. Valuable information. Fortunate me I found your web site accidentally, and I am surprised why this coincidence did not came about earlier! I bookmarked it.

  7. Lou says:

    Hello, i read your blog occasionally and i own a similar one and i was just wondering if you get a lot of spam remarks?
    If so how do you stop it, any plugin or anything you can suggest?
    I get so much lately it’s driving me crazy so any help is very much appreciated.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>