Boris Watch

An attempt to enhance the accountability of the new London mayoralty

Boris Watch header image 2

New Bus For London – £3.3m or £50m+?

October 27th, 2009 by Tom

Dave Hill’s been keeping an eye on the escalating cost of the Borismaster vanity bus project including this latest robot-post (he’s in Ireland) which has attracted a certain amount of well informed comment about amortisation and discount rates.

Meanwhile, I’ve been catching up on those pesky boring TfL PDFs that occasionally contain nuggets of interest and have found something that potentially makes £3.3m look rather small beer: TfL Finance Commitee reports, in particular the Project Monitoring/Project Approval reports.  Now, these contain two broad types of information, the first being projects recently approved for spending and secondly tables of projects already approved, which means we can easily work out cost escalations and monitor where projects are in their lifecycle via some handily defined ‘gates’, or milestones.

These Finance Committee documents take our interest today:

The report of 27th January is the first for this year, and it fairly generously allows spends up to £50m to be made under delegated powers by the Commissioner while the MD Finance gets to approve spends up to £25m.  The full Finance Committee is required for splashing out >£50m while the TfL Board deals with the really big spends.  We therefore note the following newly approved projects spends under delegated powers:

  • Stratford Station Upgrade (£48.409m)
  • King’s Cross Station Modernisation (£35.230m)
  • Heathrow Terminals 1,2,3 Station Enhancements (£19.435m)
  • DLR 3 Car East Route (£18.2m)
  • Hydrogen Bus Project (£18.8m, project cost escalation due to exchange rate and reduced from 10 buses to 8)
  • Dial-a-Ride Vehicle Purchases (£7.7m)

The complete (and very long) list of projects does not have the New Bus For London in it.

On 15th March we only have a list of projects newly approved:

  • Refurbishment of 14 Overground stations (£24.8m)
  • Early development of new Bakerloo trains (£2.97m)
  • Olympic Walking and Cycling (£0.75m)
  • Kingsbury Step Free Access (£14.043m)
  • East London Line Phase 2b (£5.5m)
  • London Underground Track Programme (£18m)

This shorter document doesn’t have a full project list and again has no mention of the New Bus For London project.

On 2nd June 2009 we have a longer report detailing the following raft of new approvals:

  • Countdown 2 (£39.9m)
  • Accommodation Strategy (£32.6m)
  • BCV/SSL Stations Asset Stabilisation 2009/10 (£48.3m)
  • BCV/SSL Civils Programme 2009/10 (£43.4m)
  • Cooling The Tube (£33m / £48m)
  • Osterley Step Free Access (£12.7m, since cancelled)
  • Ladbroke Grove Step Free Access and Station Refurbishment (£18.8m, since cancelled)
  • Hainault Station Step Free Access (£15.3m)
  • Aldgate Station Refurbishment (£11.3m)
  • Railway Timetabling System (£6.9m)
  • A406 Henlys Corner Junction Improvements (£1.6m/£8m)
  • Co-location of control rooms at Palestra (£15.2m)
  • Cycle Highways 2 pilot routes (£3.3m/£22.4m)

We then have a list of all projects with current and project spending approval.  What’s this, the New Bus for London has suddenly appeared.  What’s more it’s appeared in the table (page 11) headed ‘Projects To Be Approved By Finance Committee greater than £50m‘, which means spending on it is considered important enough to go to the full Finance Committee rather than be approved solely by Peter Hendy or lower TfL management.  This is remarkable considering the actual spend on NBfL is only £1.1m for the early stages A,B,C, covering up to the pre-tender stage in July 09, and a further £2m taking it up to £3.1m for gate D (contract award) in November 2009.  That fits in with what Kulveer and Boris have been saying, but is nowhere near the £50m that it would normally need to cost to get into the big boys project approval list.  A clue might be in the ‘Estimated Final Cost’ column, which is is ‘TBC’ for this project, while there’s a firm final cost estimated for the other 12 projects ranging from £54.4m for ‘Sub-surface lines 750V conversion’ up to £638m for ‘Victoria Station Upgrade’.  As an aside, included in there is the estimate of £142.6m for the full ten Cycle Superhighways.  That’s rather a lot of money.

So, as of June 2009, someone in TfL considers the New Bus project might have a £50m+ price tag on it, all told.

Moving on to 15th July 2009 the following new projects appear:

  • BCV/SSL Lifts and Escalator Programme 2009/10 (£29.6m)
  • Walthamstow Central Subway Interchange (£11.8m)

Moving down, the Cycle Superhighways are now at £140.450m estimated total spend, and the New Bus For London is showing an Estimated Final Cost for the first time, at £3.2m for Gate C and £3.2m for Gate D.  I’ve no idea whether this is the same £3.2m, but I’d assume it was, given that Dave’s story indicates that the cost crept up from £3m to £3.3m over the year.

We thus come to the most recent meeting, 9th October, where the following new projects emerge:

  • Tottenham Hale Gyratory removal (£11.84m/£37m)
  • Cycle Superhighway pilot routes (£22.99m) – this is the money for implementation, following on from the earlier cash for design
  • Infrastructure Development Programme (£5.6m/£22.6m)
  • Woolwich Town Centre (£5.9m)
  • New Bus For London D&D (£0.5m/£3.3m)
  • Transport Co-ordination Centre [Olympic transport planning, apparently] (£4.4m/£10.34m)
  • Signal Modernisation Programme (£13.2m)
  • 3G Bus Corridor Improvement Programme (£6.378m)
  • Olympic Walking and Cycling Programme (£2.1m/£9.8m)
  • Bank Northern Line Congestion and Step Free Access (£7.4m/£625m)

The projects over £50m table therefore currently shows NBfL costing £3.3m at Gate D (contract award) in November 2009.  What’s most interesting is the snippet marking the increase in funding by £495,000 that sheds a bit of light on why such a small project should fall into the big table:

Authority Request

Initial authority of £495k to complete the initial stages of design and development.  The authority was sought from MD Finance although within the delegated amount for MD Surface as the total potential commitment may exceed £5m depending upon procurement strategy.

Outputs and Schedule

The authority covers all activities up to award of the development contract planned for December 2009, these include:
• The design competition
• Project management costs
• Tendering of development contract

Approval

The project was granted authority of £0.5m with an expiry date of December 2009, before which the project will seek further authority for the contract award.

In other words, this really is just the preliminaries that Kulveer and Boris are talking about – depending on how they procure the fleet the eventual cost could exceed £5m (presumably the maximum David Brown, MD Surface, can approve, which is why it went to MD Finance (£5m-£25m).  Given where it sits in the full table, however, it could apparently cost in the £50m+ range, so the tidy-minded bean counters at TfL have put it there *expressly to ensure that spending decisions are taken by the Finance Committee of TfL*.

All of which means, firstly there’s an announcement of the contract award due in the next month or so and secondly they don’t know who will be paying for the buses yet, but what’s clear is that £3.3m is not the end of the cost to TfL of the New Bus for London.  It’ll be worth a regular look through the finance committee documents, not least this one which indicates large underspends at TfL in the current year.

Tags: 8 Comments

Leave A Comment

8 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Mark Lee Oct 28, 2009 at 3:31 pm

    Nobody’s made a comment on this, which doesn’t quite do justice to how good the article is… so just wanted to say… good article!

  • 2 roym Oct 29, 2009 at 11:21 am

    its always great to see the news here and at london reconnections. keep it up!

    don’t people think that the money spent on cooling the tube is a bit harsh? after all, how often will it be invoked?

  • 3 Mike Oct 29, 2009 at 12:50 pm

    The simple fact is this: in order to win an election, Boris had to pretend he wasn’t (like most Tories) an enemy of public transport, ans in particular of buses.

    So, his campaign devised a very successful PR strategy – if he proposed to bring back an outdated, pointless, but much-loved (amongst those that never use them!) bus, he could portray himself as ‘pro-buses’.

    This, successful PR strategy, has bascially saddled London with a massive bill.

    It has, however, worked. Only yesterday, a (pretty apoloitical) friend of mine expressed surprise at BoJo cutting bus routes as “he loves routemasters so much”.

  • 4 Where_art_thou_ken Oct 29, 2009 at 3:37 pm

    At the risk of moving off topic, I discovered this morning another way Boris has ’saved money’ at our expense.

    In the past when you claimed back for your late journey you received the full single paper fare (£4) – although this seems generous this did make the inconvenience of being late a bit more bareable.

    A couple of weeks ago in the Evening the entire District line closed – including the Wimbledon branch. We were all booted out of Earls court and I had to get 2 buses home.

    Imagine my annoyance when yesterday I received my refund which I applied for and it is now only £2.20 – the oyster rate for an off peak fare for the intended journey.

    This means that it only covers the cost of the failed tube journey, and not the additional costs incurred on the alternative (bus).
    Now TFL may say this is a fairer amount, but it’s not helping the relationship between customer and service. Apparently this change happened in April this year – a change which I was unaware of.
    It also means there is no element of compensation for the failed journey or the inconvenience to the passenger.

    I don’t mind the change so much but this is a very sneaky way of implementing it – and the savings will be outweighed by the annoyance to customers.

  • 5 siddiq Oct 31, 2009 at 2:31 pm

    Bendy Buses are free to ride

  • 6 Gavin Boyd Dec 8, 2009 at 5:28 pm

    The Olympic Delivery Authority (ODA) is three-quarters through its work to improve the transport network for the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games and beyond. Surely when all the transport fazes are completed it will be much easier to get around London. Although they say everything is on track I still have seen plenty of transport tender opportunities on numerous websites. A spanner could still fall in the works but lets hope not.

  • 7 Cycle Hire Costs Up Again? Jan 4, 2010 at 2:23 am

    [...] on from the promise here, Helen and I have been perusing the most recent TfL Finance documentation.  Amongst the documents [...]

  • [...] readers will know that we’ve long wondered why Boris and Kulveer pretend that the NB4L is around a £3m cost to TfL, when any [...]